Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 19(1): 753, 2019 Aug 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31462296

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Leprosy continues to be a health problem in endemic areas. More than 200,000 new cases of leprosy per year suggest that transmission of the disease is still ongoing, presumably as airborne infection through nasal droplets. Late diagnosis supports continued transmission and increases the individual risk for functional disabilities. Laboratory tools are considered beneficial to facilitate early detection and clinical assessment of cases. The aim of this study was to validate molecular tools allowing detection, quantification and assessment of viability of M. leprae from nasal swab samples which are easy to obtain without the need of any invasive procedures. METHODS: Validation of two real-time PCRs detecting M. leprae DNA (RLEP qPCR) and RNA (16S rRNA RT qPCR) was conducted on "must not detect"/"must detect" samples and 160 pre-treatment nasal swab samples from 20 clinically diagnosed multibacillary (MB) leprosy patients from Togo. RESULTS: Both assays were 100% M. leprae specific and showed analytical sensitivities of three templates each. Out of 20 clinically diagnosed MB leprosy patients, 15 (75.0%) had a positive RLEP qPCR result from nasal swab samples. The 16S rRNA RT qPCR detected viable bacilli in nasal swab samples of ten out of these 15 RLEP positive patients (66.7%). CONCLUSION: The combined RLEP/16S rRNA (RT) qPCR assay provides a sensitive and specific tool to determine the bacterial load and viability of M. leprae from nasal swab samples and is applicable for early diagnosis, monitoring treatment response and investigating the role of nasal carriage of M. leprae in human-to-human transmission through aerosol infection.


Asunto(s)
Lepra/microbiología , Mycobacterium leprae/genética , Cavidad Nasal/microbiología , ARN Ribosómico 16S , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Humanos , Lepra/diagnóstico , Lepra Multibacilar/diagnóstico , Lepra Multibacilar/microbiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mycobacterium leprae/aislamiento & purificación , Mycobacterium leprae/patogenicidad , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Togo , Adulto Joven
2.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 9(1): e3457, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25569674

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The only available vaccine that could be potentially beneficial against mycobacterial diseases contains live attenuated bovine tuberculosis bacillus (Mycobacterium bovis) also called Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG). Even though the BCG vaccine is still widely used, results on its effectiveness in preventing mycobacterial diseases are partially contradictory, especially regarding Buruli Ulcer Disease (BUD). The aim of this case-control study is to evaluate the possible protective effect of BCG vaccination on BUD. METHODOLOGY: The present study was performed in three different countries and sites where BUD is endemic: in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ghana, and Togo from 2010 through 2013. The large study population was comprised of 401 cases with laboratory confirmed BUD and 826 controls, mostly family members or neighbors. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: After stratification by the three countries, two sexes and four age groups, no significant correlation was found between the presence of BCG scar and BUD status of individuals. Multivariate analysis has shown that the independent variables country (p = 0.31), sex (p = 0.24), age (p = 0.96), and presence of a BCG scar (p = 0.07) did not significantly influence the development of BUD category I or category II/III. Furthermore, the status of BCG vaccination was also not significantly related to duration of BUD or time to healing of lesions. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we did not observe significant evidence of a protective effect of routine BCG vaccination on the risk of developing either BUD or severe forms of BUD. Since accurate data on BCG strains used in these three countries were not available, no final conclusion can be drawn on the effectiveness of BCG strain in protecting against BUD. As has been suggested for tuberculosis and leprosy, well-designed prospective studies on different existing BCG vaccine strains are needed also for BUD.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna BCG/inmunología , Úlcera de Buruli/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Preescolar , República Democrática del Congo/epidemiología , Femenino , Ghana/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Togo/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA